https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1045/0 de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/2638 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Berichtigung von Versehen </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> RGZ 23, 399 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Reichsgericht </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 26.03.1889 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> III 19/89 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-verfahren"> <div class="field-label">Instanzen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>LG Darmstadt</li> <li>OLG Darmstadt</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <p><strong>Berichtigung von Versehen, welche in einem Urteile vorgekommen sind, nach Maßgabe des §. 290 C.P.O.</strong></p> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/2638" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/2638#comments § 290 ZPO Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:31:41 +0000 Redaktion 2638 at https://opinioiuris.de