https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1128/0 de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/2808 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Gutachten des Patentamtes </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> RGZ 6, 337 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Reichsgericht </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 20.12.1881 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> II 418/81 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-verfahren"> <div class="field-label">Instanzen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>LG Leipzig</li> <li>OLG Dresden</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <p><strong>Gutachten des Patentamtes in Patentstreitigkeiten. Wie verhält sich §. 18 des Patentgesetzes vom 25. Mai 1877 zu den Vorschriften der C. P. O. über den Beweis durch Sachverständige?</strong></p> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/2808" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/2808#comments § PatG Mon, 20 May 2013 12:52:12 +0000 Redaktion 2808 at https://opinioiuris.de