https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1303/0 de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3214 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Notarielle Beurkundung von Vollmachtsurkunden von Miterben </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Bundesgerichtshof </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 16.02.1968 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> V ZR 211/64 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-richter"> <div class="field-label">Richter:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Augustin, Piepenbrock, Rothe, Freitag, Grell </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-verfahren"> <div class="field-label">Instanzen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>OLG Celle, 22.10.1964</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Tenor</h1> <p>Die Revision gegen das Urteil des 7. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Celle vom 22. Oktober 1964 wird auf Kosten des Beklagten zurückgewiesen.</p> <h1>Tatbestand</h1> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3214" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3214#comments § 167 BGB § 1932 BGB § 313 BGB Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:05:02 +0000 Administration 3214 at https://opinioiuris.de