https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1372/0 de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3368 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Bio Tabak </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> BeckRS 2009, 27214; ZLR 2010, 734 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 13.08.2009 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 3 U 199/08 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-verfahren"> <div class="field-label">Instanzen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>LG Hamburg - 05.09.2008 - AZ: 406 O 94/08</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Amtlicher Leitsatz</h1> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3368" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3368#comments § 17 LMG 1974 § 22 LMG 1974 § 3 UWG § 4 UWG § 8 UWG Sat, 06 Oct 2018 10:33:47 +0000 Administration 3368 at https://opinioiuris.de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3348 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Einzelanwaltskanzlei mit Zusatz &quot;Rechtsanwälte&quot; </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Landgericht Dresden </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 19.01.2010 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 42 HK O 345/09 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-stichwoerter"> <div class="field-label">Stichwörter:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>Ein Einzelanwalt, der auf dem Briefkopf mit dem Zusatz “Rechtsanwälte” wirbt, handelt wettbewerbswidrig.</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Gründe</h1> <p>[...]</p> <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-literatur"><legend>Literaturverzeichnis</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-externa"> <div class="field-label">Externe Literatur:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>Keller, Max-Lion: <a href="https://www.it-recht-kanzlei.de/briefkopf-rechtsanwalt-abmahnung.hml.html">LG Dresden: Irreführende Angaben im Briefkopf eines Rechtsanwalts sind abmahnbar</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3348" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3348#comments § 10 BORA § 3 UWG § 4 UWG Mon, 28 May 2018 19:27:17 +0000 Administration 3348 at https://opinioiuris.de