https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1373/0 de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3355 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Kooperation mit Wirtschaftsprüfer </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> AnwBl 2014, 557, NJW-RR 2014, 611; ZIP 2014, 793; MDR 2014, 605; GRUR 2014, 496; VersR 2014, 856; WM 2014, 866; MIR 2014, Dok. 058 BB 2014, 1106 DB 2014, 890 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Bundesgerichtshof </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 06.11.2013 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> I ZR 147/12 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-verfahren"> <div class="field-label">Instanzen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>LG Hof - 22.02.2012 - AZ: 1 HKO 60/11</li> <li>OLG Bamberg - 02.07.2012 - AZ: 3 U 47/12</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Amtlicher Leitsatz:</h1> <p>a)</p> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3355" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3355#comments § 5 UWG Tue, 29 May 2018 03:21:40 +0000 Administration 3355 at https://opinioiuris.de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3349 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> &amp; Associates </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> NJW-RR 2012, 817; MDR 2012, 1181; GRUR-RR 2012, 287 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 28.03.2012 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 6 U 146/10 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-stichwoerter"> <div class="field-label">Stichwörter:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>Wettbewerbsverstoß: Firmierung eines Rechtsanwalts unter der Bezeichnung "Dr. X &amp; Associates"</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Tenor</h1> <p>1. Die Berufung der Beklagten (Ziff. 2) gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Karlsruhe vom 06.08.2010 - 4 O 108/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.</p> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3349" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3349#comments § 3 UWG § 5 UWG Mon, 28 May 2018 21:04:42 +0000 Administration 3349 at https://opinioiuris.de