https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1378/0 de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3358 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Zusammenschluss zu einer überörtlichen Sozietät unter Beibehaltung der rechtlichen Selbständigkeit </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> BGHZ 194, 79, NJW 2012, 3102, ZIP 2012, 1960, MDR 2012, 1194, DB 2012, 2217, AnwBl 2012, 840, NZG 2012, 1098 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Bundesgerichtshof </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 12.07.2012 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> AnwZ (Brfg) 37/11 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Amtlicher Leitsatz:</h1> <p>a)</p> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3358" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3358#comments § 43b BRAO § 8 BORA Tue, 29 May 2018 15:33:37 +0000 Administration 3358 at https://opinioiuris.de https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3356 <fieldset class="fieldgroup group-daten"><legend>Daten</legend><div class="field field-type-text field-field-fallname"> <div class="field-label">Fall:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Kurzbezeichnung einer Kanzlei mit drei Anwälten im Briefbogen </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen"> <div class="field-label">Fundstellen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> BRAK-Mitt 2011, 256-258; KP 2011, 212; MDR 2011, 890-891; NJW-Spezial 2011, 511 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-gericht"> <div class="field-label">Gericht:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Landgericht Arnsberg </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-datum"> <div class="field-label">Datum:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 03.03.2011 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-akte"> <div class="field-label">Aktenzeichen:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> 8 O 32/11 </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-typ"> <div class="field-label">Entscheidungstyp:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Urteil </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-text field-field-stichwoerter"> <div class="field-label">Stichwörter:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <ul> <li>Kurzbezeichnung von drei Namen ohne namentliche Aufführung von mindestens drei Anwälten</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </fieldset> <h1>Amtlicher Leitsatz:</h1> <p><a href="https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3356" target="_blank">Weiterlesen</a></p> https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/3356#comments § 10 BORA § 8 BORA § 9 BORA Tue, 29 May 2018 14:12:26 +0000 Administration 3356 at https://opinioiuris.de