<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://opinioiuris.de"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>opinioiuris.de - § 2353 BGB</title>
 <link>https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1955/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>de</language>
<item>
 <title>OLG Düsseldorf, 15.06.2015 - I-3 Wx 103/14	</title>
 <link>https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/4264</link>
 <description>&lt;fieldset class=&quot;fieldgroup group-daten&quot;&gt;&lt;legend&gt;Daten&lt;/legend&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-fallname&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Fall:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    Prüfung auf Testierunfähigkeit des Erblassers auf Demenz        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Fundstellen:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    FamRZ 2015, 2088        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-gericht&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Gericht:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-datum&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Datum:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    15.06.2015        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-akte&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Aktenzeichen:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    I-3 Wx 103/14	        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-typ&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Entscheidungstyp:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    Beschluss        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/fieldset&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/4264&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Weiterlesen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/4264#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://opinioiuris.de/kategorie/rechtsnorm/%C2%A7-2229-bgb">§ 2229 BGB</category>
 <category domain="https://opinioiuris.de/kategorie/rechtsnorm/%C2%A7-2353-bgb">§ 2353 BGB</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 12:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Administration</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4264 at https://opinioiuris.de</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

