<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://opinioiuris.de"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>opinioiuris.de - § 41 UrhG</title>
 <link>https://opinioiuris.de/taxonomy/term/1994/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>de</language>
<item>
 <title>OLG München, 22.05.2003 - 29 U 5051/02</title>
 <link>https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/4296</link>
 <description>&lt;fieldset class=&quot;fieldgroup group-daten&quot;&gt;&lt;legend&gt;Daten&lt;/legend&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-fallname&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Fall:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    Pumuckl-Illustrationen        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-fundstellen&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Fundstellen:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    NJW-RR 2003, 1627; GRUR-RR 2004, 33        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-gericht&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Gericht:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    Oberlandesgericht München        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-datum&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Datum:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    22.05.2003        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-akte&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Aktenzeichen:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    29 U 5051/02        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-text field-field-typ&quot;&gt;
      &lt;div class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Entscheidungstyp:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    Urteil        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/fieldset&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Haben Sie den Volltext? &lt;a href=&quot;/contact&quot;&gt;An uns zur Veröffentlichung senden.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


</description>
 <comments>https://opinioiuris.de/entscheidung/4296#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://opinioiuris.de/kategorie/rechtsnorm/%C2%A7-101a-urhg">§ 101a UrhG</category>
 <category domain="https://opinioiuris.de/kategorie/rechtsnorm/%C2%A7-13-urhg">§ 13 UrhG</category>
 <category domain="https://opinioiuris.de/kategorie/rechtsnorm/%C2%A7-41-urhg">§ 41 UrhG</category>
 <category domain="https://opinioiuris.de/kategorie/rechtsnorm/%C2%A7-97-urhg">§ 97 UrhG</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Administration</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4296 at https://opinioiuris.de</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

